The following is
an article I wrote in 2009.
A Shariah expert
claims that Asset-based Sukuk Mudarabah and Musharakah will fall out of favour
as it is hard to accommodate a ruling on repurchase pledges, indicating the
market would be permanently affected by the decree.
According to
Moody’s, the issuance of Musharakah and Mudarabah based Sukuk fell 83 percent
and 68 percent respectively in 2008.
Bankers and
lawyers have been seeking ways to structure Sukuks that comply with a 2008
ruling by AAOIFI which forbids “borrowers” in Sukuk Mudarabah and Musharakah
from promising upfront to pay back their face value at maturity. This follows a
rule that parties must share risks under these structures but the industry had
been concerned it would make Islamic bonds less palatable to investors. But the
market is trying to find ways to accommodate the prohibition. However, Shariah
adviser Dr Mohd Daud Bakar said it would be tough to do so, "It's very difficult
because it goes against the very essence of Mudarabah and Musharakah because
you cannot guarantee the capital (or profits) in equity-based contracts."
(Reuters)
Which is exactly
my point. Mudarabah and Musharakah are equity-based contracts and therefore
should not be treated as debt-based contracts. Why the industry continues to
structure debt papers based on an equity structure baffles me.
A Sukuk is not a
bond and a Sukuk is defined by the underlying contract that governs it.
After so many
years of being exposed to Shariah based finance, I’m stumped that the so called
Islamic bond fund managers (and the rest of the market really) still view
Mudarabah and Musharakah Sukuks as debt instruments. Well, I’m telling them
again – it’s NOT. Sukuk Mudarabah and Musharakah investors are not borrowers;
they are partners who are supposed to understand and willing to assume risks
associated with such investments.
The market
should take the lead by re-identifying their investment needs and demand the
appropriate structure. If they want to invest in fixed income instruments, look
for Ijarah, Murabahah or Istisna based structures.
If they want to
invest in Mudarabah and Musharakah Sukuks, they better make sure they are
looking at them from the equity perspective.
The reason why
we are facing this problem is because we (the market/industry) continue to
apply Shariah based finance on the conventional platform. If a Mudarabah and/or
Musharakah based Sukuk has identical features with a conventional bond, why
bother having an Islamic finance industry? Since the underlying structure is
identical, we might as well merge the two since there is no difference apart
from the name and legal documentation.
The growth of
the Sukuk market can only be achieved if the industry accepts Sukuk as a unique
instrument instead of equating it to and treating it like a conventional bond.
No comments:
Post a Comment